Investigation of Clonal Relationship Between Candida Parapsilosis and Candida Glabrata Strains Isolated from Blood Culture by Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 63 ISSUE: 2
P: 62 - 68
March 2025

Investigation of Clonal Relationship Between Candida Parapsilosis and Candida Glabrata Strains Isolated from Blood Culture by Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis

Med Bull Haseki 2025;63(2):62-68
1. Tavsanli Doc. Dr. M. Kalemli State Hospital, Clinic of Medical Microbiology, Kutahya, Turkey
2. Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Medical Microbiology, Malatya, Turkey
3. Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Tokat, Turkey
4. Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Malatya, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 18.04.2025
Accepted Date: 20.04.2025
Online Date: 04.06.2025
Publish Date: 04.06.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Aim

Candidemia may occur when endogenous Candida species in the intestinal microbiota enter the bloodstream in patients with risk factors. Apart from endogenous transmission, patients can also transmit it exogenously. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the fluconazole susceptibility and genotypes of Candida parapsilosis (C.parapsilosis) and Candida glabrata (C. glabrata) strains that cause candidemia.

Methods

Twenty-six C. parapsilosis and sixteen C. glabrata strains were included in the study. Fluconazole sensitivity was determined by the broth microdilution method. Genotyping of strains was done by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Results

Nine (34%) of C. parapsilosis strains and 3 (19%) of C. glabrata strains were found to be resistant to fluconazole. Among 26 C. parapsilosis isolates, 17 different genotypes were detected and clustered isolates were collected in five clusters. Fourteen out of the 26 C. parapsilosis isolates are placed in one of the clusters, with a clustering rate of 53.8%. Among 16 C. glabrata isolates, 11 different genotypes were detected and divided into four clusters. Nine out of the 16 C. glabrata isolates are placed in one of the clusters, with a clustering rate of 56.2%.

Conclusion

Our data indicated the possibility of nosocomial transmission of C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata among intensive care unit patients in our hospital. Infection control policies should be strictly applied in our hospital to prevent cross-transmission.

Keywords:
Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, fluconazole susceptibility, genotype

Introduction

Bloodstream infections caused by Candida are less common than those caused by other pathogens. They are seen especially in patients who have undergone surgery, those in intensive care for long periods, those who are cancer patients, and immunocompromised patients who have undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Candida species are isolated from 4.5% of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (1). Among Candida spp., Candida albicans (C. albicans) is the most common species worldwide, although recently non-albicans Candida species have been reported to be more common (2). Additionally, the incidence of non-albicans Candida species varies from region to region. While Candida parapsilosis (C. parapsilosis) is more common in Asia (including Japan and China), Latin America (including Brazil), and Southern Europe, C. glabrata is more common in the United States, Australia, and Northern Europe (3).

Candida parapsilosis strains can spread more easily in hospitals than other Candida species because they can stick to surfaces, attach to the hands of healthcare workers and medical devices, and last on surfaces for up to 28 days. Some studies have shown that C. parapsilosis strains have high minimal inhibitory concentrations for echinocandin drugs due to naturally occurring FKS1 polymorphism. Additionally, very high azole resistance rates have been reported in some regions. This makes it difficult to choose empiric antifungal drug treatment in C. parapsilosis infections (4-7). Recently, the rate of isolation of Candida glabrata (C. glabrata) from bloodstream infections has been increasing. Candida glabrata is isolated from 18-25% of candidemia cases in North America. It is the second most common Candida species causing candidemia. In addition, C. glabrata is the main bloodstream fungal pathogen in patients with hematological malignancies. Azole group antifungals are frequently used for prophylaxis and treatment of candidemia. As a result, azole resistance is gradually increasing among C. glabrata isolates. While the azole resistance rate of C. glabrata strains worldwide is around 8%, in some centers, this rate exceeds 20% (8, 9).

Candidemia can happen when Candida species that normally live in the intestines get into the bloodstream of patients who have certain risk factors like cancer, long stays in intensive care, or long-term use of antibiotics. In addition to endogenous transmission, it can also be transmitted exogenously from patient to patient. Genotyping can help clarify potential Candida outbreaks in hospitalized patients and whether exogenous transmission is occurring (10).

We hypothesized that there is a link between fluconazole resistance and genotypes in C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata strains. We aimed to investigate the fluconazole susceptibility and genotypes of C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata strains that cause candidemia. Additionally, it was investigated whether there was clustering among genotypes. This will contribute to the strict implementation of infection control policies such as hand washing, using protective equipment, and staff training to prevent cross-contamination in hospitals and to antimicrobial resistance surveillance to prevent the spread of resistant isolates.

Materials and Methods

Compliance with Ethical Standards

For the study, ethics committee approval was obtained from the Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval no.: 23-KAEK-027, date: 16.02.2023). Written consent was obtained from all participants, and the study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Design

It is a cross-sectional study that included C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata strains causing candidemia between November 2019 and September 2021. Firstly, identification of strains isolated from blood culture was performed, and antifungal susceptibility tests were performed. Identification of Candida strains was performed with the YST8 diagnostic panel (Diagnostics, Slovenia), using their characteristic appearance in cornmeal Tween-80 (Himedia, India) medium and the Vitek II automatic device (bioMérieux, France). Fluconazole sensitivity was determined by the broth microdilution method (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A Supplement 4 clinical breakpoints. Candida krusei American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 6258 and C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were used as quality control strains.

Then, the genotypes of the strains were determined by pulse-field gel electrophoresis. Electrophoretic karyotyping for discrimination of isolates was performed as previously described in the literature with minor modifications (11, 12). Electrophoresis was performed in 0.5×TBE buffer using the contour-clamped homogeneous electric field method with a Contour-Clamped Homogeneous Electric Field DRII system (Bio-Rad, Richmond, USA). The electrophoresis conditions were 12°C at 6 V/cm² for 48 hours. The initial and final switch times were 90 seconds and 360 seconds, respectively. For all methods, each gel was stained with ethidium bromide (5 mg/mL) and destained in tap water and then viewed and photographed under ultraviolet light.

Analysis of arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction band profiles was performed with the GelCompar software package (version 6.5; Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). The Dice correlation coefficient was used for similarity calculations for band analysis, and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean was used for clustering analysis. If the Dice similarity coefficient value was below 95%, isolates were identified as different genotypes.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 20 (IBM, USA). Whether the numerical data were normally distributed was evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test. The expression of normally distributed data is “mean ± standard deviation”, and the expression of non-normally distributed data is “median (25th percentile-75th percentile).” Student’s t-test was used to compare numerical data that followed a normal distribution, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare numerical data that did not follow a normal distribution. To compare qualitative data, the chi-square test was used. When more than 20% of cells had expected frequencies <5, Fisher’s exact test was used.

Results

While the number of C. parapsilosis that caused candidemia between November 2019 and September 2021 was 26, the number of C. glabrata was 16. The median age of the patients with C. parapsilosis was found to be 74 years (65-83). The median age of the patients with C. glabrata was 65 years (56-74). The median age of the patients with C. parapsilosis was significantly higher than that of patients with C. glabrata (p=0.036). Twenty-five (96%) of the patients with C. parapsilosis were receiving treatment in intensive care, and 1 (4%) in the oncology service. 14 (88%) of the patients with C. glabrata were receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 2 (12%) in the oncology service (Table 1).

Of the C. parapsilosis strains, 13 (50%) were susceptible to fluconazole, 4 (15%) were dose-dependent susceptible, and 9 (35%) were resistant. Of the C. glabrata strains, 13 (81%) were susceptible in a dose-dependent manner to fluconazole, and 3 (19%) were resistant. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range, MIC50, MIC90, and geometric mean values of the strains are given in Table 2.

Among 26 C. parapsilosis isolates, 17 different genotypes were detected, which were collected into five clusters (tolerance 1.0, optimization 3.0, cut-off 95%). Fourteen out of the 26 C. parapsilosis isolates are placed in one of the clusters, with a clustering rate of 53.8%. The largest cluster is genotype 1 with four isolates. It is followed by genotype 8, and genotype 13 clusters with three isolates, while genotype 7 and genotype 9 cluster with two isolates. (Figure 1)

Among 16 C. glabrata isolates, 11 different genotypes were detected. The clustered isolates were collected into four clusters (tolerance 1.0, optimization 3.0, cut-off 95%). 9 out of the 16 C. glabrata isolates are placed in one of the clusters, with a clustering rate of 56.2%. The largest cluster is the genotype 1 with three isolates. It is followed by genotype 5, genotype 6, and genotype 7, each forming clusters with two isolates (Figure 2).

Discussion

Long ICU stays, long-term systemic antibiotic use, underlying immunosuppressive diseases, and old age are the main candidemia risk factors (1). In this study, 96% of the patients isolated with C. parapsilosis and 88% of the patients isolated with C. glabrata were in the ICU. The number of patients over 60 years of age with isolated C. parapsilosis was 21 (81%). It was found to be 11 (69%) in C. glabrata patients. Various studies, similar to our study (13-15), have reported that Candida infections are more common in older patients, those in intensive care, and those with underlying diseases. It is known that the incidence of C. parapsilosis strains decreases with age, while the incidence of C. glabrata strains increases with age (16). However, in the current study, the median age of the patients with C. parapsilosis was significantly higher than that of patients with C. glabrata (p=0.036). The reason for this different result may be because of the examination of a certain period and the limited number of patients.

Antifungal resistance is a major problem in the treatment of candidemia. Fluconazole is usually used in the treatment of candidemia as well as other invasive Candida infections (17). Although C. parapsilosis isolates are usually reported as susceptible to fluconazole, recent studies have documented an increase in fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis isolates (18). Pfaller et al. (19), in their study examining the activity of fluconazole against 20.788 invasive Candida spp. isolates collected from 39 countries between 1997 and 2016, reported that 3.9% of C. parapsilosis isolates were resistant to fluconazole. The rate of fluconazole resistance was reported as 26.4% in C. parapsilosis isolates in a recent study from our country. In the current study, 35% of C. parasilosis isolates were found to be resistant to fluconazole. However, in a study published by Caggiano et al. (20) in 2024, the fluconazole resistance rate in C. parapsilosis strains was reported as 82%. In the study by Misas et al. (4), while the fluconazole resistance rate of C. parapsilosis strains was found to be 17% in 2020, this rate became 34% in 2021. All these results show that the fluconazole resistance rate of C. parapsilosis strains has been increasing recently. This makes empirical drug selection and treatment of these strains quite difficult.

In a review study conducted by Beardsley et al., (21) fluconazole resistance rates in C. glabrata strains were found to range from 0% to 48% in 52 studies. In 16 of these, the fluconazole resistance rate was found to be above 10% (21). Castanheira et al. (22) have collected 1846 bloodstream isolates from 31 countries. They have documented that 11.9% of C. glabrata isolates were resistant to fluconazole. Yu et al. (13) reported a 6% fluconazole resistance rate in C. glabrata strains causing bloodstream infections. In this study, 81% of C. glabrata isolates were susceptible-dose dependent (S-DD) to fluconazole, while 19% were resistant. The incidence of C. glabrata strains and resistance rates to azole-echinocandin antifungals used in first-line therapy are increasing worldwide. Strategies need to be evaluated and implemented to prevent infection from occurring.

Candidemia mostly originates from endogenous Candida spp., but it can also be acquired. The pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) plays an important role in tracking the source of candidemia, differentiating isolates, and conducting epidemiological investigations (23). In this study, we used PFGE to investigate the genetic relatedness among both the C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata isolates from candidemia.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis results of 26 C. parapsilosis isolates revealed the presence of 17 different genotypes. Fourteen of the 26 C. parapsilosis isolates were grouped into 5 clusters and one major group. All clustered isolates are from ICU patients. The largest cluster includes genotype 1, with 4 isolates. Three of these genotype 1 isolates were fluconazole resistant, while the other one was S-DD. The fact that all of these patients were treated in the same ICU and none of them were susceptible to fluconazole suggested that these strains originated from the same source. Pulcrano et al. (24) have analyzed 19 strains of C. parapsilosis isolated from the blood cultures of neonates by PFGE. They have reported a high degree of relatedness between the isolates. In their study, in which Caggiano et al. (20) examined 50 C. parapsilosis strains phylogenetically, it was found that fluconazole-resistant strains were similar to environmental strains. It was concluded that these strains may have been transmitted from the hospital environment. Another remarkable result was that all patients in genotype 13, the second largest cluster with 3 patients, had malignancy. In addition, the patients in this cluster were in the same ICU. Results suggest that these strains may have been transmitted from patient to patient within the hospital.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis results indicated that 9 of 16 C. glabrata isolates were clonally related with a clustering rate of 56.2%. All these isolates were recovered from the ICU except one. Two of the three fluconazole-resistant C. glabrata isolates belonged to genotype 6. Hwang et al. (8) examined 79 C. glabrata strains that caused infection in blood and found two different clusters in the same hospital. Similar to our study, they revealed that these strains were transmitted between patients treated within the hospital setting.

Study Limitations

The limitations of the current study are that the number of strains examined is small. This is because the study covers strains that grow within a certain period of time. Additionally, susceptibility testing could only be performed for fluconazole. Sensitivity testing against other antifungal drugs could not be performed. Despite these limitations, determining the genotypes of Candida strains and finding a cluster among them are the strengths of our study.

Conclusion

Our data indicated the possibility of nosocomial transmission of C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata among ICU patients in our hospital. Infection control policies such as hand washing, use of protective equipment, and personnel training should be strictly applied in our hospital to prevent cross-transmission. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance is crucial to prevent the spread of resistant isolates.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study, ethics committee approval was obtained from Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval no.: 23-KAEK-027, date: 16.02.2023)
Informed Consent: Written consent was obtained from all participants and the study complied with the human rights declaration.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: E.S.T., Concept: A.A., G.Y., Design: A.A., G.Y., B.O., Data Collection or Processing: E.S.T., Analysis or Interpretation: E.S.T., G.Y., B.O., Literature Search: A.A., G.Y., Writing: A.A., G.Y.
Conflict of Interest: No conflicts of interest were declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: This study received no financial support.

References

1
Wolf S, Weber S, Janetta A, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes ofCandida spp. bloodstream infections in cancer patients: a comparative retrospective study from a German tertiary cancer center. Infection. 2025. Epub ahead of print.
2
Chen L, Xie Z, Jian J. Epidemiology and risk factors of Candidemia a 8-year retrospective study from a teaching hospital in China. Infect Drug Resist. 2024;17:3415-23.
3
Bays DJ, Jenkins EN, Lyman M, et al. Epidemiology of invasive Candidiasis. Clin Epidemiol. 2024;16:549-66.
4
Misas E, Witt LS, Farley MM, et al. Molecular and epidemiological investigation of fluconazole-resistantCandida parapsilosis-Georgia, United States, 2021. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11:ofae264.
5
Govrins M, Lass-FlörlC. Candida parapsilosis complex in the clinical setting. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024;22:46-59.
6
Govender NP, Patel J, Magobo RE, et al. Emergence of azole-resistantCandida parapsilosis causing bloodstream infection: results from laboratory-based sentinel surveillance in South Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:1994-2004.
7
Pfaller MA, Moet GJ, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanheira M.Candida bloodstream infections: comparison of species distributions and antifungal resistance patterns in community-onset and nosocomial isolates in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2008-2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:561-6.
8
Hwang IJ, Kwon YJ, Lim HJ, et al. Nosocomial transmission of fluconazole-resistantCandida glabrata bloodstream isolates revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12:e0088324.
9
Healey KR, Perlin DS. Fungal resistance to echinocandins and the MDR phenomenon inCandida glabrata. J Fungi (Basel). 2018;4:105.
10
Guinea J, Arendrup MC, Cantón R, et al. Genotyping reveals high clonal diversity and widespread genotypes ofCandida causing candidemia at distant geographical areas. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:166.
11
Riederer K, Fozo P, Khatib R. Typing ofCandida albicans and Candida parapsilosis: species-related limitations of electrophoretic karyotyping and restriction endonuclease analysis of genomic DNA. Mycoses. 1998;41:397-402.
12
Shin JH, Chae MJ, Song JW, et al. Changes in karyotype and azole susceptibility of sequential bloodstream isolates from patients withCandida glabrata candidemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2385-91.
13
Yu SN, Hong SI, Park JW, Jeon MH, Cho OH. Epidemiology and clinical features ofCandida bloodstream infections: a 10-year retrospective study in a Korean teaching hospital. J Fungi (Basel). 2025;11:217.
14
Cohen Y, Karoubi P, Adrie C, et al. Early prediction ofCandida glabrata fungemia in nonneutropenic critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:826-30.
15
Smyth J, Mullen CC, Jack L, Collier A, Bal AM. Diabetes, malignancy and age as predictors ofCandida glabrata bloodstream infection: a re-evaluation of the risk factors. J Mycol Med. 2018;28:547-50.
16
Guinea J. Global trends in the distribution ofCandida species causing candidemia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(Suppl 6):5-10.
17
Bassetti M, Righi E, Montravers P, Cornely OA. What has changed in the treatment of invasive candidiasis? A look at the past 10 years and ahead. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(Suppl 1):i14-25.
18
Escribano P, Guinea J. Fluconazole-resistantCandida parapsilosis: a new emerging threat in the fungi arena. Front Fungal Biol. 2022;3:1010782.
19
Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Turnidge JD, Castanheira M, Jones RN. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results forCandida species from 1997-2016. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(Suppl 1):S79-94.
20
Caggiano G, Fioriti S, Morroni G, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics ofCandida parapsilosis bloodstream isolates: health care associated infections in a teaching hospital in Italy. J Infect Public Health. 2024;17:967-74.
21
Beardsley J, Kim HY, Dao A, et al.Candida glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabrata): a systematic review of clinical and microbiological data from 2011 to 2021 to inform the World Health Organization fungal priority pathogens list. Med Mycol. 2024;62:myae041.
22
Castanheira M, Messer SA, Rhomberg PR, Pfaller MA. Antifungal susceptibility patterns of a global collection of fungal isolates: results of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program (2013). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:200-4.
23
Canela HMS, Cardoso B, Frazão MR, et al. Genetic diversity assessed using PFGE, MLP and MLST inCandida spp. candidemia isolates obtained from a Brazilian hospital. Braz J Microbiol. 2021;52:503-16.
24
Pulcrano G, Roscetto E, Iula VD, Panellis D, Rossano F, Catania MR. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and microsatellite markers to evaluateCandida parapsilosis transmission in neonatal intensive care units. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:2919-28.